Subscribe
Previous Post
The majority of autistic children are diagnosed between the ages of 18 months and 3 years old.*
Children receive many immunizations in this same period of time.
Therefore, it has often been concluded that “vaccines cause autism.”
But this conclusion is a case, and a “rather commonly abused” one, of correlation being mistaken for causation.
Mark C. Chu-Carroll of Science Blogs in a January 25th post on Good Math, Bad Math provides a clear and thoughtful explanation of these terms:
- Correlation…..
- …..”is a linear relationship between two random variables.”
- ……”means that as one value changes, another variable changes in the same way.”
An example of correlation that Chu-Carroll uses is to measure shoe and also the heights of a group of men. As measurements generally show that foot size is in proportion to one’s maximum adult size, he notes that ” if I did a mapping between the size of feet and height in adult men, I would find a strong correlation between height and foot size.” He refers to an actual study in which the length of people’s ring fingers was compared to “the size of the vocabulary that people use in the course of a normal day” (based on a hypothesis regarding the hormones that a fetus is exposed to in the womb) as an example in which there was “no correlation to speak of.”
Causation, on the other hand is not “really a mathematical notion.” Rather:
- Causation
- ……”means that when one value changes, it causes the other to change.”
Chu-Carroll then considers the immunization-autism correlation:
… people see the correlation between receiving immunizations and the diagnosis of autism, and assume that that means that the immunizations cause autism. But in fact, there is no causal linkage. The causal factor in both cases is age [my emphasis]: there is a particular age when a child’s intellectual development reaches a stage when autism becomes obvious; and there is a particular age when certain vaccinations are traditionally given. It just happens that they’re roughly the same age.
Nonetheless, Chu-Carroll is careful to note that “there’s a catch” to this neat division between correlation and causation, as “correlation does strongly suggest a causal relationship.” In the case of such a “strongly” suggested “causal relationship,” Chu-Carroll emphasizes that further examination of the data are needed, and that one should keep one’s eyes open for some additional third factor (such as age in the immunization-autism correlation). He further points out that, in the face of proponents of one theory or another “waving around statistics”:
To show causation, you need to show a mechanism for the cause, and demonstrate that mechanism experimentally. So when someone shows you a correlation, what you should do is look for a plausible causal mechanism, and see if there’s any experimental data to support it. Without a demonstrable causal mechanism, you can’t be sure that there’s a causal relationship – it’s just a correlation.
I find Chu-Carroll’s explanations of these concepts of correlation and causation quite illuminating in regard to one of the thorniest issues in Autismland, the vaccine-autism issue and its corollaries, the mercury/thimerasol-autism issue and (now that epidemiological studies show that the numbers of autism diagnoses continues to increase even years after thimerasol was removed from childhood vaccines), the mercury/environmental toxins/autism issue. That not everyone in Autismland is considering so carefully what is correlation and what looks like causation—-that there is, rather, a tendency to see one thing (child exhibiting autistic “symptoms”) and recall another thing (dates of immunizations) and add these up to equal “vaccines cause autism”—has been egregiously apparent in much online writing about autism in the month of January. Read David Kirby on there is no autism epidemic or two recently posted Huffington Post pieces by autism mothers (and numermous other stories) which all but state that mercury poisoning causes autism, and that call on us to stop wasting time presenting views of autism that “soften” what it is and to go on an all-out, and well-publicized search—whatever the correlations—for the cause. By omitting the crucial step of looking for a third factor, proponents of these theories make connections that seem obvious, but that are not completely substantiated, nor true.
Indeed, I note a certain correlation, somewhat measurable, among the above-cited posts and their use of terms such as epidemic.
The Kirby post referred to was the one that mentioned children suffering from “rivers of diarrhea,” et alia. A few days later, autism mother Kim Stagliano wrote a post about all things kaka in life with autism. While her Stupid Autism Tricks post did not make explicit reference to this topic, more than a few commenters agreed with her inveighing against some recent “softening” views of autism by mentioning numerous bodily substances that ended up in various places around the commenters’ houses from which they would have preferred not to have had to scrape them off. Just a few hours ago, yet another autism mother-authored post appeared that detailed the messy and the kaka as “what autism really is,” vs. the (literally) sanitized version on The View‘s recent autism show and various other studies, books, etc..
David Kirby is not, of course, an autism parent, but still it seems to have become part of the genre of “real autism writing” to include concrete descriptions of kaka (not a euphemism) into one’s writing about autism, especially when one is writing about a very “real” phenomenon related to autism, the “epidemic of autism.
Is there a correlation here between increased mention of kaka and mention of an “epidemic” of autism? Further: Might this be one of those cases in which, as Chu-Carroll notes, correlation is causation? In which constant, perseverating, focus on the “bad things” (this is the literal translation of the classical Greek word kaka) of life with autism results—causes—some to think that there is an “epidemic” of autism, as if to underscore or prove just how bad things are?
And if you don’t think that all of that computes, consider: What if we focused, each time we wrote about autism and especially our autistic children, just on what they do, however small and mundane: Standing on the porch to look for us when we come home from work, gnawing on chicken bones, sitting on a New Jersey Transit train, running hyper circles through the house late at night while warbling sounds at the top of his lungs. What if we tried to take even some of those “bad things” and just see them not as bad, not even as good, but just what is—what our child is—and see how simply rewarding life can be. Because we have this life with our child, whom we love.
Perhaps if we tried this, even the notion of an “epidemic” of autism would not seem so scarey, not evoke so much alarm, so that—even as research continues into finding the causes of autism—we can alike continue to live with both the kaka and the kalagathia, the beautiful and the good, of autism.
*[12.40pm, 1 Feb 07: A study published in 2006 found that the average age of diagnosis in children in metropolitan Atlanta was 5 years 1 month overall and 4 1/2 years for children who were more severe (see this CDC press release from May 2006); information from New Jersey's Division of Family Health Services: Special Child Health and Early Intervention Services notes that "national average age of diagnosis is between the ages of 3 and 4, even though a reliable diagnosis can be made by age 2." Thanks to Club 166 for this information.]
1506 days ago
[...] McArdle writes that claims of a vaccine-autism link are based on associative thinking that confuses correlation with causation: Our brains are designed to learn by associating events that happen at the same time, or in close [...]
1652 days ago
[...] see: The candy industry is making a correlation between “more candy sold” and “more time trick or treating.” For myself, [...]
1774 days ago
[...] It is quite a correlation. [...]
1792 days ago
[...] Kirby not making a correlation with a strong hint of causation (on his part) in noting that vaccine rates in Mexico are now 92% [...]
1850 days ago
[...] is always useful to recall that correlation does not equal causation. ASD, Aspergers, autism, cell phone, children, Education, electromagnetic, electronic, family, [...]
1861 days ago
[...] teaching something more “controversial” such as evolution. The question of “what causes autism” has yet to be played out in the courtroom, though mention “mercury” or [...]
1882 days ago
[...] Nonetheless, the New York Times article particularly highlights research that seeks to find the cause of autism, namely, prenatal sonograms. Assemblyman Joseph Pennacchio (a Republican representing parts of Morris and Passaic Counties) is the sponsor for bill A-3669, which “requires DHSS [Department of Health and Senior Service] to study relationship between autism and ultrasounds and issue protocol for use of ultrasounds.” Pennachio notes research done by Philip A. DeFina, the chief scientific officer for the International Brain Research Foundation (IBRF); DeFina notes that research has been done “by researchers at Yale and in Sweden that showed disruption of fetal brain development in lab animals after ultrasounds, and a Minnesota study of autopsied brains of autistic children that found a similar pattern of abnormal nerve cell migration.” [...]
1893 days ago
[...] What causes autism? [...]
1898 days ago
[...] The February 27th New York Times notes that the fertility clock ticks for men as well as women. “Mounting evidence” from a number of research studies is cited: Older dads father children who are more likely to have “abnormalities” (like autism?) and are at risk for “certain rare birth defects.” “It’s like a light-bulb factory,” said Dr. [Avi] Reichenberg, the author of the autism study [which analyzed data from a large Israeli military database to determine if there is “a correlation between paternal age and the incidence of autism and related disorders”]. “You can manufacture a billion light bulbs, but some fraction are going to be impaired. When you’re manufacturing something so frequently, in such large quantities, the chances of an error are very high.” [...]
1905 days ago
[...] The notion that “TV causes autism” seems to me as good an example as any about why correlation does not equal causation; see Novel Intent for a scientist’s thoughtful critique of the “TV causes autism” theory. [...]
1918 days ago
[...] It seems that a correlation (and a rather loose one at that) is made between the rise in cell phone use and the resulting greater volume of radiation in the atmosphere, and a rise in the prevalence of autism. Somehow this increase in radiation is seeping into “our children’s cells” (whether while a child is in utero or after birth is not specified), without further substantiation and without noting the possibility of a change in the diagnostic criteria for autism, and in better understanding of what autism is. [...]
1919 days ago
[...] “Vaccine” and “autism” had become for me—have become in the public psyche—not merely linked. These two words, which have nothing intrinisically to do with each other, have become equated, and because of coincidence, of a correlation that seems to contain a clue to causation: An 18-month-old child receives her or his immunizations. An 18-month-old child is noticed to not be playing in varied ways, or interacting, or speaking. The parent knows they have “done everything” to ensure their child’s health and development, has followed the advice of the pediatrician exactingly, and then some, so it must be some external agent, some mysterious force, that has caused this terrible change in a child. And—-because so much seemed to go wrong when the doctor’s advice and instructions were first followed—the parent, now with not only a “diseased” child but one with hard-to-control behaviors, turns away from traditional medicine and seeks answers elsewhere. [...]
1923 days ago
[...] My friend and sister-blogger-mother Mom-NOS notes that “we move in the direction of our dominant thought” and offers two examples from recent writing about autism as (so to speak) bad OR beautiful: Think “I hate autism” (or “I fear autism” or “I am exhausted by autism” or “I resent autism”) and you move, psychologically and emotionally, toward those dominant thoughts – toward hate, toward fear, toward exhaustion, toward resentment. [...]
1923 days ago
[...] “Really good,” I said. “He really likes his school.” And I told him about how structured Charlie’s classroom is, the exacting attention to his particular learning style and needs, the focus on him and who he is and how to foster learning from there. [...]
I have questioned the vaccine theory and this shows me that I was right to do so….my son was different from birth, so I knew the vaccines had not caused his autism, however I did find it interesting that many children had a later onset of signs and symptoms. My thoughts on that were that those children may have had some sort of allergy to the thimerasol in the vaccines. However, I am no scientist, just a mother who thinks too much sometimes! I think it is apparent that scientists will most likely be researching the causes of autism for many years and in the meantime, I will focus on appropriate treatments for my son and hope to help bring them to other children as well. I also think what you wrote was very thoughtful and indeed very timely. I hope many read this.
This is a very thoughtful post and quite timely.